Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:34 am
by Timmo
a 15 mi;le back road blast is the longest mines been driven like it, if was nay distance used then was left in std mode,

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:47 am
by surjit25
If you lower the dshafts are going to vibrate like hell.
Then the frt struts gonna keep bottoming and they might be damaged internally.

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:45 am
by Timmo
not nessecverily, its the same principle as lowering a normaly sprung car, as long as the shaft alignment isnt altered then the shafts shouldnt vibrate any more than normal! mine certainly dont when in lowered mode!
you'll only really bottom out the struts if you have it Very low and are Giving it some on a rough surface!
never had issues with either vibrating shafts or bottoming out on mine with it half way between the two notches.

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:33 pm
by Simran
I really cant understand why people think lowering the car with the lever is such a bad idea. The Height correctors are alot simpler than you think. It is literally a valve that when open, moves the other side until it closes - think toilet cistern, water level goes down, valve opens until level returns - valve closes. Citroen have 'cut' 4 slots in the gate for us to use that they think are adequate for road use, cutting more in wont harm the car in any way, what will harm the car is if you lower it and bottom the suspension out. If you choose a position that under normal driving never seems to bottom out, then continue enjoying your car. :)

Just to note, line pressures or any forces or strains on the system dont change by lowering your car by this method so dont be scared by it. Any problems that do arise are due to other issues such as not increasing the effective spring rate which you SHOULD do if you lower your car. Bad handling is due to a change in suspension geometry and bottoming out, the spheres are doing the exact same job they were doing before.

Whether you use the lever method or choose to rotate the clamp on the anti roll bar, you are effectively doing the same thing, fooling the car into thinking it is higher up than it is, so it keeps moving itself downwards until the valves in the height correctors close, voila lower ride height.

Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:52 am
by docchevron1472
Thats not strictley right actually.
The HC's are an active part of the suspension, there are damping discs in the HC's that do have an effect on the response rate of the suspension and there is a reason why the control rod doesn't contact the HC when the lever is set to normal ride height.

Citroen never intended the car to be driven at anything other than normal ride height, intermediate height is solely for giving extra clearance to get over large lumps or whatever, but they state (for good reason) that the car should be returned to normal height after clearing said obstacle.
Low and high are for service use only.
Whilst there's nowt wrong in lowering the ride height using the ARB clamp it's fundamentally bad practice to use the lever to attain those results.

As it goes the valver rides a tad lower than a diesel etc anyway, so there is scope for playing about with the ride height but to do that using the lever is bad practice.

yet again

Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 10:51 am
by Toddman
I welcome anyone to come and drive my valver to see what they think of the suspension.
Fact of the matter is if you lower the car using the height lever it will not handle as well as it should.
My car is lowered via the roll bar clamps to make the car lower to aid handling, and after lots of testing and consulting with time proven motorsport people ended up running the spheres that were mentioned earlier.

You can use the XM V6 spheres but they are really only suitable for track use as they are VERY harsh.

Simran when Chris had your valver he got me to sort him out the same spheres as I am running so unless you have replaced them you will be bale to lower your car with the lever without suffering the adverse affects you get with the standard spheres.

Cheers
Luke

Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 11:44 am
by badlyworntoy
It seems that this has turned into quite a hot topic and knowbody seems to be able to agree?......simran you seem like a wise man,although im confused as to which way to go,could someone please sumerise as to the combination to use
ie.......Xm v6 sphere's front and rear or just front....bx valver front on rear or rear on front....etc etc
Extra notch in ride height lever or swivelling clamps???
which is it?
This is almost like a form of black magic

Also a daft question while im on.......Whats the science behind driveshafts vibrating when they point upwards and not downwards???ive always wanted to know this and knowbody ever seems to know
cheers

spheres

Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 12:22 pm
by Toddman
Hi

My cars spec is here - http://www.bx16valve.co.uk/9.html

And I seriously doubt you will find a better combination of spheres for road and track use combined.

The guys who I worked with getting things right have been racing Citroens since the Ds days so know their stuff.
You can check out their website here - http://www.langworth-motorsport.com/

They don't do much general work these days but our family has been using them for a long time and one of the owners lives a few doors down from me.

I tried the V6 spheres and it was just silly,I also tried softer spheres from the 8v GTi and the rear of my car almost bottomed out when launching for a sprint.

Hope that helps

Cheers
Luke

theres more

Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 12:28 pm
by Toddman
I almost forgot!

Simrans car was running standard spheres that had been regassed with a lower pressure but Chris was not happy so decided to see what we could sort out, when Simran took on the car it was running the regassed to 35bar xm fronts on the BX rear and the old BX rears moved to the front so as I said unless Simran has changed them again you should be able to lower that car however you like without suffering the terrible bouncing you usually get when lowering a valver without changing the spheres.

Cheers
Luke

Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:54 pm
by surjit25
I have already tried this, if lowered 10-15mm it's ok,
m anymore like 25-30mm the driveshafts vibrate and the
front struts start to bottom and give a loud thud when hitting a pothole or speed bump.
In the long run this will not be good for the struts.
For extra firmness I have tried xantia hydractive spheres they are up to the
job but I changed them back later as I thought it's a Citroen
why stiffen the suspension, it should be a flying carpet ride.

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 8:19 pm
by Pete H

Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 9:08 pm
by Timmo
Have you seen How jeth lowered his though?? Not the safest of lowering Methods! ;-)

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 11:46 am
by Pete H
Sure, we know each other. :wink:

Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2014 9:50 am
by Mungous
Wow. That's... ...something else.

My car is lowered by about 40-50mm front and rear with no adverse effects from the driveshafts. It's not a daily driver though.

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 4:29 pm
by Harvey12
Pete, I am incredibly impressed. I did not think it was feasible to drop the car that low.

Not only a major engineering feat, but an artistic statement, too.

How well does it drive sitting that low? I assume you have to be exceedingly careful turning.