Interesting graphs - you can clearly see the extra breathing ability the extra 8 valves give to the engine! And to me it looks like the 16v is a pretty well designed engine. The 8v is a good engine IMHO and the 16v manages to more or less match it to 4.5krpm and then takes off.
Whats the difference between the XU9J2 and the XU9JA?
why has bx16v got no low down torque??
Carl
---------------
1990 Citroen BX 16v
1982 Rover 3500SE
1988 Volvo 360 GLT (for sale)
www.carlgibbs.com/gallery
---------------
1990 Citroen BX 16v
1982 Rover 3500SE
1988 Volvo 360 GLT (for sale)
www.carlgibbs.com/gallery
- kriskarrera
- Tick Over
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:54 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
8 v 16
This has been discussed many times and the true answer is always the same -
The 16v out performs the 8v in just about every way, if you drive your car like a diesel then yes the 8v is better but for anyone after somn epower the 16v is still a superb piece of kit.
Nothing wrong with the 8v though but it is just not an mi
Cheers
Luke
The 16v out performs the 8v in just about every way, if you drive your car like a diesel then yes the 8v is better but for anyone after somn epower the 16v is still a superb piece of kit.
Nothing wrong with the 8v though but it is just not an mi
Cheers
Luke
Please call me Luke
1989 BX 16valve White 70k almost up to scratch
1989 BX 16valve White 70k almost up to scratch