Ignition without getting Dizzy
Ignition without getting Dizzy
would someone like to share with me the relative merits of adding distributor less ignition?
Is it hard to do?
Just what do i need and where can i source the parts from?
How does it plug into the standard ECU?
Thinking it's an option (thats been suggested a number of times), and since i'm not aiming to put the enigne in till xmas it gives me some time!
Is it hard to do?
Just what do i need and where can i source the parts from?
How does it plug into the standard ECU?
Thinking it's an option (thats been suggested a number of times), and since i'm not aiming to put the enigne in till xmas it gives me some time!
ign
Vanny I may well be wrong here but AFAIK you cannot just make the usual ign system distributorless.
I have not looked deeply into this but I am pretty sure you need an ecu that is capable of controlling a coilpack so like I have said before the Motronic 3.1 is ideal.
I honestly think you will struggle to just bolt on a coilpack un;ess you change the ecu or pay out for some fancy triggering system.
Mike E talks of Owens car but sadly no real info has been mentioned yet.
I am sure it would be a popular mod though is straightforward and cheap.
Cheers
Luke
I have not looked deeply into this but I am pretty sure you need an ecu that is capable of controlling a coilpack so like I have said before the Motronic 3.1 is ideal.
I honestly think you will struggle to just bolt on a coilpack un;ess you change the ecu or pay out for some fancy triggering system.
Mike E talks of Owens car but sadly no real info has been mentioned yet.
I am sure it would be a popular mod though is straightforward and cheap.
Cheers
Luke
Please call me Luke
1989 BX 16valve White 70k almost up to scratch
1989 BX 16valve White 70k almost up to scratch
- robin hughes
- 5000 rpm
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:08 pm
- Location: st austell, cornwall
ecu
Thankyou Adrian - about time someone cleared this all up.
Like I keep saying it is not easy to just bin the dizzy you need to be able to control a coilpack.
Cheers
Luke
Like I keep saying it is not easy to just bin the dizzy you need to be able to control a coilpack.
Cheers
Luke
Please call me Luke
1989 BX 16valve White 70k almost up to scratch
1989 BX 16valve White 70k almost up to scratch
-
- 4000 rpm
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:16 pm
- Location: South Bucks, England
The merits are removal of HT parts that wear,leak to earth and cause ignition interference. The Solid state system is fit and forget.
Most, if not all, modern cars have them.
A suitable electronic interface is needed to mate the ZX system on a BX16V.
Best solution of all is to mount a mini ignition coil on each spark plug and have no HT leads at all.
It would be possible to fit this type of system on a BX if you could find coils that would fit the head, and had lots of time to sort out the circuitry.
Most, if not all, modern cars have them.
A suitable electronic interface is needed to mate the ZX system on a BX16V.
Best solution of all is to mount a mini ignition coil on each spark plug and have no HT leads at all.
It would be possible to fit this type of system on a BX if you could find coils that would fit the head, and had lots of time to sort out the circuitry.
coils
That is fine until it is time to change the spark plugs then you find likek my bro did with his xsara that disturbing the individual coils makes one of them suddenkly die.
I have to say I don't think the std system is that bad it is just a shame PSA are such robbers.
Cheers
Luke
I have to say I don't think the std system is that bad it is just a shame PSA are such robbers.
Cheers
Luke
Please call me Luke
1989 BX 16valve White 70k almost up to scratch
1989 BX 16valve White 70k almost up to scratch
Could you use the cam cover from a 2.0 iron block 16V lump, with the big centre cover to accomodate the unit coils used on later 405 and the ZX 16V/306 S16? Come to think of it, Xsara VTS as well?Mike E (uk) wrote:It would be possible to fit this type of system on a BX if you could find coils that would fit the head, and had lots of time to sort out the circuitry.
Doubt there's any difference - would need to check the part number for the cam cover gasket to be sure though.
If it is the same, could rob the whole system from one of these cars and re-map to suit.
Adrian
- docchevron1472
- 4000 rpm
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:53 am
- Location: The End of the World
- Contact:
I dont think it would fit? The heads are different although I stand to be correctedAdrian E wrote: Could you use the cam cover from a 2.0 iron block 16V lump, with the big centre cover to accomodate the unit coils used on later 405 and the ZX 16V/306 S16? Come to think of it, Xsara VTS as well?
Doubt there's any difference - would need to check the part number for the cam cover gasket to be sure though.
If it is the same, could rob the whole system from one of these cars and re-map to suit.
Adrian
Cheers
Chris G
1990 BX 16v Phase 2
1989 BX TD hybrid
1971 BL 350FG Ambulance (unique)
1993 Dennis Lance 132
That's when I reach for my Revolver
1989 BX TD hybrid
1971 BL 350FG Ambulance (unique)
1993 Dennis Lance 132
That's when I reach for my Revolver
There is small differences, but the cam cover will fit have I been told.docchevron1472 wrote:I dont think it would fit? The heads are different although I stand to be correctedAdrian E wrote: Could you use the cam cover from a 2.0 iron block 16V lump, with the big centre cover to accomodate the unit coils used on later 405 and the ZX 16V/306 S16? Come to think of it, Xsara VTS as well?
Doubt there's any difference - would need to check the part number for the cam cover gasket to be sure though.
If it is the same, could rob the whole system from one of these cars and re-map to suit.
Adrian
Cheers
Chris G
The heads differs on bolt pattern for exhaust, and the guides for the intake manifold are not in the same place.
-
- 4000 rpm
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:16 pm
- Location: South Bucks, England
A quick look at the GTi8V circuit diagram shows the differences.
The solid state system is a wasted spark, and the coil is in effect also the distributor.
Two trigger signals are required from the ECU instead of one. These must have the correct phase so the correct pair of cylinders gets the spark.
Because 2 plugs fire at once; the coil charge time may be longer, so additional spark advance may be required. This complicates things.
I think it is not really necessary to replace the whole engine management system to get these signals. It is not a '5 minute' job though.
Mike
The solid state system is a wasted spark, and the coil is in effect also the distributor.
Two trigger signals are required from the ECU instead of one. These must have the correct phase so the correct pair of cylinders gets the spark.
Because 2 plugs fire at once; the coil charge time may be longer, so additional spark advance may be required. This complicates things.
I think it is not really necessary to replace the whole engine management system to get these signals. It is not a '5 minute' job though.
Mike
Just to add my two penoths worth, there isn't really any reason for not sticking with standard with a better coil and driver, any modded system is more xpensive used is greater than a dizzy cap occasionally!
The coil pack in cover arrangement used on the later 16v 406/ xantia etc is rubish and expensive in its own right!! fails intermittently and gives spurious other "faults"
What could be done fairly easily is to use the standard ECU, but rig up your own phase sensor in place of dizzy and use it to drive a small circuit which selects which coil pack to energise through a normal amp and double ended coils useing wasted spark, could also easily make it select individual coils if prefered, just choose carefully as many small coils have size constraints which have made them rather less reliable than the dirty great ones of old!
The coil pack in cover arrangement used on the later 16v 406/ xantia etc is rubish and expensive in its own right!! fails intermittently and gives spurious other "faults"
What could be done fairly easily is to use the standard ECU, but rig up your own phase sensor in place of dizzy and use it to drive a small circuit which selects which coil pack to energise through a normal amp and double ended coils useing wasted spark, could also easily make it select individual coils if prefered, just choose carefully as many small coils have size constraints which have made them rather less reliable than the dirty great ones of old!
-
- 4000 rpm
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:16 pm
- Location: South Bucks, England
- kriskarrera
- Tick Over
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:54 pm
- Location: Wiltshire